( 1 ) THIS Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of india aggrieved by the order dated 28-3-2007 passed by the Court of the principal Junior Civil Judge, Warangal in marking Ex. A. 3 document in evidence subject to objection in O. S. No. 916 of 2005.

( 2 ) THE revision petitioner herein is the 1st defendant in the suit. The 1st respondent herein is the plaintiff who filed the suit for recovery of money. During the trial, when the document in question was tendered in evidence on behalf of the plaintiff, the defendants raised an objection stating that the said document was not a promissory note but only a bond and since the same was not sufficiently stamped, it cannot be admitted in evidence. The Court below having taken note of the objection, marked the said document as Ex. A. 3 subject to objection. Aggrieved by the same, this Revision Petition is filed contending inter alia that the Court below ought not to have marked the document subject to objection without deciding as to whether the said document is properly stamped or not.

( 3 ) HEARD the learned counsel on both sides and perused the material on record.

( 4 ) AS per Section 35 of the Indian Stamp

Click Here to Read the rest of this document