RAMESH RANGANATHAN
P. MANOHAR REDDY – Appellant
Versus
APPELLATE AUTHORITY UNDER SECTION 53 OF THE A. P. SHOPS AND ESTABLISHMENTS ACT AND Assistant COMMISSIONER OF LABOUR – Respondent
( 2 ) THE petitioner was appointed as a veterinary service representative in the respondent-company with effect from 10-12-1989. He met with an accident on 13-04-1992. After undergoing extensive treatment he reported for duty along with a medical fitness certificate. His joining report was accepted, he was permitted to join duty, the period from the date of his accident till he joined duty was treated as leave, he was paid medical expenses and other benefits and he commenced work from 11-01-1993. While matters stood thus the second respondent, vide letter dated 05-06-1993, asked him to "stop work" from 08-06-1993. Petitioner would submit that, as the order to "stop work" was neither an order of suspension nor termination of his services, he was continued to be paid full wages. However, from 01-10-1993, the 2nd respondent stopped paying wages. As several
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.