SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(AP) 791

C.V.RAMULU
TARLOCHAN KAUR, SECUNDERABAD – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER FOR WORKMENs Compensation, ELURU – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.RAMALINGESVARA RAO, A.SUDERSHAN REDDY, G.S.Sanghi

( 1 ) THIS Writ Petition is filed seeking a mandamus declaring the Order of the 1st respondent passed in W. C. No. 52/99 dated 30-1-2003 and aiso the Order dated 13-12-2004 in Review Petition No. WC. MP. 7/ 2003, WC. MP. 8/2003, WC. MP. 9/2003 and wc. MP. 10/2003 as arbitrary, illegal and without jurisdiction.

( 2 ) IT appears, petitioners are the management of Preeti Comforts and Preeti engineers. Respondents 3 and 4 are the parents of the deceased- Tanuku Vijaya Durga santa Vara Prasad, who was an employee of the petitioners. While he was travelling during the course of employment in a train, died due to train accident. It appears, parents of the deceased Vara Prasad filed a claim petition in O. A. A. No. 104 of 1999 before Railway claims Tribunal, Secunderabad against the 2nd respondent. The Railway Claims Tribunal, after full trial passed an Award dated 11-6-1999 directing the 2nd respondent to pay a sum of Rs. 1,50,000/- each to respondents 3 and 4. Thereafter, respondents 3 and 4 have also filed W. C. No. 52 of 1999 on the file of the 1st respondent claiming compensation of Rs. 4. 00 lakhs before the 1st respondent. According to the petitioners, respondents 3 and A suppresse



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top