SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(AP) 1388

T.CH.SURYA RAO
CHINTHALA CHERUVU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF A. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.Rajashekar Reddy, PRABHAKAR REDDY

( 1 ) A-1 and A-2 in the crime seek to invoke the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code to quash the criminal proceedings pending against them in C. C. No. 2055/2005 on the file of the additional Judicial Magistrate of 1st Class, kothagudem.

( 2 ) ON a private compliant filed by the second respondent herein, the same has been forwarded to the police for investigation, eventually, at the culmination of investigation, a charge sheet was filed against the petitioners alleging inter alia the offences punishable under Sections 420, 468, 471, 506 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code. Cognizance of the offence was taken by the Court for the said offences.

( 3 ) IT was alleged inter alia in the charge sheet that A-2 is the wife of A-1 and both of them together have been running business as partners under the name and style of Venkata durga Fertilisers at Paloncha. The defacto-complainant. G. Chenna Reddy mediated between the accused-petitioners and the ryots for supply of pesticides and fertilizers to the ryots and as a security, he handed over four blank cheques bearing Nos. 027 448 to 027 450 containing his signatures drawn on co-operati














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top