SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(AP) 908

Andhra Pradesh High Court
Judges : T.MEENA KUMARI
STATE OF A. P - Appellant
Versus
M. NAGESHWAR RAO, M. NARAYANA - Respondent
Decided On : 09/13/2007
Criminal Appeal 1009 Of 2005

Advocates Appeared: C.PADMANABHA REDDY

Headnote:

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – Section 174 – Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 302, 306 and 498-A – Cruelty – Offence of Murder and Abetment of Suicide – Appeal against conviction – Accused married deceased – Accused is a B. Tech Mechanical Engineer and working they were residing at Yellareddyguda in the house of Smt. Saroja as tenants for past one year prior to date of incident – Due to increased non-cooperation of deceased on issues like food, wearing of dresses, sending money to his parents, stay of his brother in his house with them, taking her to USA with him etc – Accused changed his mind and wanted to get rid of his wife and was waiting for opportunity to do away with life of his wife – While so, so deceased expressed her desire with accused to have a cool drink – Accused immediately went to a nearby general store and purchased Limca soft drink and brought same to nearby STD booth cabin and mixed some quantity of cyanide, which he was possessing, in limca bottle and gave it to his wife for consumption – When she requested him to share the said Limca, he avoided same and went away from house on pretext of attending urgent work at Computer Institute – Deceased consumed some quantity of the said Limca and collapsed in the house – When house owner PW-7 received a phone call for deceased and went to portion of deceased to call her, she did not get any response when she knocked the door and then she peeped through the window and saw the deceased lying on a chair – Held, Though motive is not clearly established by adducing any direct evidence, as the murder has been established beyond all reasonable doubt and the animosity of the accused towards deceased can be gathered from the circumstances, we are of considered view that accused deserves no sympathy having regard to the nature of the offence committed by him. We are also fortified in our view with a decision of Supreme Court in Krishna Pillai Sree Kumar v. State of Kerala, 1981 SCC (Crl.) 669 wherein it was held in any case, it is not a sine qua non for the success of prosecution that motive must be proved. So long as other evidence remains convincing and is not open to reasonable doubt, a conviction may well be based on it – Court hold that Court below did not consider evidence available on record in proper perspective and that reasons given by Court below in arriving at the conclusion that the accused is not guilty of offence under Section 302 IPC are perverse in nature – Prosecution has established its case against respondent - accused for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC beyond all reasonable doubt – Criminal appeal allowed.

T. MEENA KUMARI, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is preferred by the State against the judgment of acquittal dated 27. 10. 2004 passed in S. C. No. 349 of 2001 on the file of the Court of I additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad.

( 2 ) THE case of the prosecution, briefly stated, is as follows: the accused Nageshwar Rao married the deceased Laxmi Kumari on 30. 4. 2000 at annavaram Temple, East Godavari District and both of them are native of Khammam district. The accused is a B. Tech Mechanical Engineer and working at Ameerpet, hyderabad. They were residing at Yellareddyguda in the house of Smt. Saroja as tenants for the past one year prior to the date of incident. Though they lived happily for some time, subsequently differences arose between them and due to frequent quarrels with his wife on several issues initially the accused decided to commit suicide and for that purpose he procured cyanide from his friend brahmachary (PW-4), who is a goldsmith by profession. However, due to increased non-cooperation of the deceased on the issues like food, wearing of dresses, sending money to his parents, stay of his brother in his house with them, taking her to USA with him etc. , the accused changed his mind and wanted to get rid of his wife and was waiting for opportunity to do away with the life of his wife. While so, on 2. 9. 2000 at about 4 p. m. or so the deceased expressed her desire with the accused to have a cool drink. The accused immediately went to a nearby general store and purchased Limca soft drink and brought the same to nearby STD booth cabin and mixed some quantity of cyanide, which he was possessing, in the limca bottle and gave it to his wife for consumption. When she requested him to share the said Limca, he avoided the same and went away from the house on the pretext of attending urgent work at the Computer Institute. The deceased consumed some quantity of the said Limca and collapsed in the house. When the house owner PW-7 received a phone call for the deceased and went to the portion of the deceased to call her, she did not get any response when she knocked the door and then she peeped through the window and saw the deceased lying on a chair. She immediately called PW-3 maidservant and both of them shifted the deceased to Mytri hospital. In the morning of 3. 9. 2000, the brother of the accused informed PW-1 the father of the deceased through phone that his daughter laxmi Kumari fell seriously ill and was admitted in the hospital. Immediately, he along with his wife rushed to Hyderabad on the same day and went to the hospital and found their daughter in unconscious state. While undergoing treatment, the deceased was declared dead by the doctors of Mytri Hospital on 3. 9. 2000 at 8. 30 p. m. There upon, PW-1 went to the police station and lodged a complaint before the Police, S. R. Nagar Police Station at 9. 15 p. m. stating that he received message about his daughter's illness and he came to Hyderabad and he does not know under what circumstances his daughter died and therefore to look into the matter and take necessary action. Basing on Ex. P-1 complaint given by pw-1, the police initially registered a case in Cr. No. 589 of 2000 under Section 174 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and took up investigation and shifted the dead body to Gandhi Hospital for post mortem examination. PW-15, S. I. of Police, visited the place of occurrence and conducted scene of observation panchanama under Ex. P-5 and also prepared rough sketch Ex. P-6 in the presence of mediators pw-12 and another. As the deceased died under suspicious circumstances within seven years of her marriage, he sent a requisition to the Revenue Development officer for deputing the Mandal Revenue Officer for conducting inquest. PW-11 mandal Revenue Officer conducted inquest on the dead body of the deceased in the presence of the mediators PW-9 and another and she also examined the parents of the deceased and recorded their statements. PW-14 Civil Assistant

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top