SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(AP) 949

G.V.SEETHAPATHY
D. S. MURTHY – Appellant
Versus
D. BHARATHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: K.SURESH REDDY, S.R.Sanku

( 1 ) THIS revision case is filed by the petitioner assailing the orders dated 21-8-2007 in crl. M. P. No. 2988 of 2007 in C. C. No. 385 of 2007 on the file of IV Additional Chief metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, wherein the petition filed by the revision petitioner undersection245 (1)Cr. P. C. seekingdischarge from the prosecution was dismissed.

( 2 ) THE revision petitioner is accused of offences under Sections 465 and 471 IPC in c. C. No. 385 of 2007. The first respondent herein is the stepmother of the petitioner-A. 1. She gave a complaint alleging that she is the owner of the house property situated in S. D. Road, Secunderabad, having got the same from her parental family and that accused 1 and 2, who are her step sons, approached the municipal authorities seeking mutation in the name of their sons accused 3 and 4 on the ground that the husband of the complainant executed a will in favour of his grand sons in respect of the said house property. The complainant further alleges that A-1 forwarded a letterto the Municipal authorities fabricating the signature of the complainant thereon purporting to seek the mutations and she came to know about it when the municipal authoriti













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top