SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(AP) 750

J.B.KOSHY, M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
RUKIYA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: M.RAMESH CHANDER, P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON

J. B. KOSHY, J.

( 1 ) INSURANCE company is the appellant herein. The husband of respondent no. 1 while travelling in a Maruti car bearing registration No. KAO M-M 3035, the car went out of control and hit against a tree causing death of the insured. He was the owner of the car and he himself was the insured. A claim petition was filed under section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles act, 1988, by the legal representatives of the deceased that the monthly salary was rs. 10,000 and deceased was an income tax payer. Tribunal found that his income was only Rs. 3,000. The contention of the insurance company is that the deceased himself was the insured and, therefore, owner or his legal representatives cannot claim compensation in the absence of a personal accident coverage. The insurance company cannot be held liable to pay compensation of the insured as the policy was taken only for indemnifying the liability of the owner of the vehicle to pay damages or compensation for causing injuries to other persons. The contention raised by claimant was that such a defence cannot be taken by insurance company in view of the decision of the Full Bench in National Insurance co. Ltd. v. Malathi C. Salian,


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top