SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(AP) 620

CHIDANANDA ULLAL, V.JAGANNATHAN
NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
LAGAMANNA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.N.Krishna Swamy, VIGNESHWAR SHASTRY

V. JAGANNATHAN, J.

( 1 ) IN this appeal, national Insurance Co. Ltd. has questioned the finding of Tribunal saddling liability on it to pay the compensation to the injured-claimants.

( 2 ) WE have heard learned counsel Mr. A. N. Krishnaswamy for the appellant and the learned counsel, Mr. Vigneshwar Shastri for the respondents. It is contended by mr. A. N. Krishnaswamy that the policy in question does not cover the risk of the coolies carried in the tractor-cum-trailer as no extra premium was paid to cover such a larger liability and in view of this position, it is not in dispute between the parties that tribunal could not have fastened the entire liability on the insurance company, but at the most, it could have confined the liability of the respondent insurance company to that which arises out of the Workmen's compensation Act. In this regard, reliance is placed on the decision of Apex Court. So far as the quantum of compensation is concerned, learned counsel for respondent has got no grievance. Therefore, the only issue is whether the Claims Tribunal was right in fastening the entire liability on the insurance company.

( 3 ) IN view of there being no dispute insofar as the facts







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top