CHIDANANDA ULLAL, V.JAGANNATHAN
NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
LAGAMANNA – Respondent
( 1 ) IN this appeal, national Insurance Co. Ltd. has questioned the finding of Tribunal saddling liability on it to pay the compensation to the injured-claimants.
( 2 ) WE have heard learned counsel Mr. A. N. Krishnaswamy for the appellant and the learned counsel, Mr. Vigneshwar Shastri for the respondents. It is contended by mr. A. N. Krishnaswamy that the policy in question does not cover the risk of the coolies carried in the tractor-cum-trailer as no extra premium was paid to cover such a larger liability and in view of this position, it is not in dispute between the parties that tribunal could not have fastened the entire liability on the insurance company, but at the most, it could have confined the liability of the respondent insurance company to that which arises out of the Workmen's compensation Act. In this regard, reliance is placed on the decision of Apex Court. So far as the quantum of compensation is concerned, learned counsel for respondent has got no grievance. Therefore, the only issue is whether the Claims Tribunal was right in fastening the entire liability on the insurance company.
( 3 ) IN view of there being no dispute insofar as the facts
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.