SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(AP) 842

HARJIT SINGH BEDI, S.B.SINHA
A. P. S. R. T. C. REP. BY ITS CHIEF LAW OFFICER – Appellant
Versus
M. PENTAIAH CHARY – Respondent


S. B. SINHA, J.

( 1 ) LEAVE granted.

( 2 ) WHETHER in the facts and circumstances of this case multiplier of 15' ought to have been applied by the High Court in its impugned judgment falls for consideration in this appeal which arises out of a common judgment and order dated 29. 08. 2006 passed by the High Court of Judicature of Andhra pradesh in Appeal against Order No. 528 of 2000 and C. M. A. No. 3350 of 1999.

( 3 ) BEFORE embarking upon the said question, we may notice the basic fact of the matter which is not in dispute. Claimant was aged about 38 years on the date of accident which took place on 26. 01. 1995. He was a carpenter working in a company. His monthly salary was said to be Rs. 4500/ -. He had 15 years of experience in woodcrafts. His parents, wife, two daughters and one son were dependant on him. On the night of 25. 01. 1995, he was coming back to his house. When he was riding on a two-wheeler, he met with the accident having been hit by a bus belonging to the appellant corporation. He was thrown on the road and dragged to a distance of 10 to 15 yards. He suffered serious multiple injuries, viz. , fracture of left hand (humour); fracture of left eight ribs; ruptu





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top