SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(AP) 672

SHISHIR KUMAR, AMITAVA LALA
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
DAYA RAM – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: Vipin Chandra Dixit

AMITAVA LALA, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is arising out of the judgment and award dated 10th May, 2007 passed by the Commissioner, under the Workmen's compensation Act, 1923 (hereinafter called as the "commissioner"), Kanpur Region, camp Etawah in Case No. 8 of 2005 (Daya ram and another v. R. D. Electricals Contractor and another) on account of death of the deceased while working on the high tension line. Five consecutive deaths were occurred. The claim petitions have been made by the claimants saying that a sum of Rs. 3,045/-was the salary of the deceased but ultimately at the time of hearing the employer stated that such persons were kept in the muster roll and the daily wages of the muster roll employees were Rs. 145/- per day. Therefore, awarded amount was increased from the claimed amount on such fact.

( 2 ) NOW the question arose as to whether the Commissioner is empowered to pass an award more than the claim amount or not. According to us, normally it can not exceed. However, such rule, according to us, cannot be inflexible in nature. A clamant, either for his illiteracy or for lack of knowledge or for situation arrived on account of death or injury, may not be in a position to




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top