SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(AP) 772

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
MUDDASANI SAROJANA – Appellant
Versus
MUDDASANI VENKAT NARSAIAH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: I.Aga Reddy, P.V.NARAYANA RAO

( 1 ) THIRD defendant in O. S. No. 81 of 1981 on the file of the learned subordinate Judge, Karimnagar, filed this Second Appeal, aggrieved by the judgment and decree, dated 30. 12. 1993, passed by the learned 1 Additional district Judge, Karimnagar, in A. S. No. 13 of 1990.

( 2 ) THE first respondent (who is since dead and represented by his successors) filed the suit, for recovery of possession of the suit schedule property and mesne profits thereof. The case of the first respondent is as under: his father father late Veeraiah and one Sri Balaiah were the sons of one Sri Rajaiah. Yashoda s the wife of Balaiah. They did not have any issues, and Balaiah died in the year 1950 or so. Yashoda was given the suit schedule property in a fami y settlement, with life interest in her. She died some time in the year 198. The limited share of Yashoda enlarged into absolute estate, by operation of Section 14 of the Hindu Succession Act (for short the Act) and since she did not have any Class-I heirs, the property devolved upon the sister of her husband, by name Buchamma. He purchased the suit schedule property from Buchamma, through the sale deed, dated 25. 04. 1981, marked as Ex. A. 1 and po















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top