SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(AP) 1021

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
ADAPA TATARAO – Appellant
Versus
CHAMANTULA MAHALAKSHMI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: S.Subba Reddy, T.BHEEMSEN KUMARI, V.V.RAMANA RAO

L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J.


( 1 ) THIS C. R. P. , under Section 115 of C. P. C. , is filed againsf the judgment and decree dated 24-11-2003, passed by the Court of i Additional Junior Civil Judge, Kakinada, in O. S. No. 874 of 1999. The respondent filed the suit for the relief of recovery of possession of Item-l of the plaint schedule, comprising of 50 cents, and for the relief of perpetual injunction, as regards Item-ll, admeasuring 30 cents. Both the bits are in Sy. No. 32/2e of karakuduru Village, of East-Godavari District. It was pleaded that she purchased the land through a sale deed dated 07-06-1973 in the name of her husband, and that ever since then, she has been in possession and enjoyment of the same. Certain disputes were said to be pending between herself and Pedapudi Co-operative Society as regards the plaint schedule property. It was alleged that the petitioner herein had trespassed into Item-l of the plaint schedule on 18-07-1999, and had threatened to occupy Item-ll thereof. Therefore, she filed the suit for the relief referred to above. Petitioner filed a written-statement, denying the contents of the plaint. According to him, his wife is the absolute owner of Item-l of








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top