SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(AP) 558

D.S.R.VERMA, G.ROHINI
UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
COL. L. S. NO. MURTHY – Respondent


Advocates:
A.CHAYA DEVI, A.Raja Sekhar Reddy

G. ROHINI, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is preferred under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, the Act) against the order dated 5-11 -2004 in O. P. No. 1457 of 2001 on the file of the Court of Ill-Addl. Chief Judge, City Civil court, Hyderabad, whereunderthe application made by the appellant herein undersection 34 of the Act to set aside the arbitral award dated 6-6-2001 was dismissed.

( 2 ) THE facts, in brief, may be noted as under: the second respondent herein was awarded the contract for supply of fresh fruits at supply depots at Tirumalgherry, Hakimpet and ASC golconda for the period from 1-10-1999 to 30-9-2000 in pursuance of the tenders invited by the appellant. As per the agreement dated 6-8-1999 executed between the parties, the second respondent was required to make the supply of fresh fruits in terms of the specifications and conditions annexed to the agreement. It is not in dispute that in pursuance of the said agreement though the supply of fruits was commenced with effect from 1-10-1999, the 2nd respondent stopped the supply from 6-6-2000 on the ground that nonlocal variety of fruits demanded by the appellant were not available. Consequently






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top