SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(AP) 521

S.ANANDA REDDY
MOHD. AYUB – Appellant
Versus
MOHD. ABDUL LATEEF KHAN – Respondent


Advocates:
E.SAMBASIVA PRATAP, Mohd.Moin Ahmed Quadri

( 1 ) THIS revision petition is filed by the respondent in the E. P. No. 5 of 2005 in O. P. No. 1115 of 2001, aggrieved by the order passed by the Special Tribunal, which ordered issuance of warrant for delivery of the possession of the suit schedule property in accordance with the order passed in the main O. P.

( 2 ) THE grievance of the petitioner is that the execution petition is not maintainable as the Tribunal has no jurisdiction to execute the order passed by the Special tribunal under Order XXI CPC, as the procedure for giving effect to the orders of the Special Tribunal are provided under the a. P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Rules 1988 (hereinafter referred to as the Rules ). According to the petitioner, the Special tribunal shall communicate its order to the parties as well as to the Revenue Divisional officer concerned, and if an order is passed in favour of the petitioner, who sought for recovery of possession by eviction of the respondent, the Revenue Divisional Officer is obligated to give effect to the said order, as is contemplated under Rule 15 of the rules, and therefore, in view of the specific provision provided under the Rules, the execution petition filed und





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top