2006 Supreme(AP) 506
V.V.S.RAO
KATA AROGYAIAH – Appellant
Versus
CHIPPA PENTAMMA – Respondent
Advocates:
A.M.CHAKRAVARTHY, RANGA RAO, VEDULA VENKATARAMANA, VILAS V.AFZUL PURKAR
( 1 ) IN all these civil revision petitions filed under Section 91 of A. P. (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 (the Tenancy Act, for brevity), the petitioners and the respondents are same. By common order, dated 30-4-2005 in case No. F2/5767/ 2004 and case No. F2/6916/2004, the Joint collector, Ranga Reddy District allowed the appeals filed by respondents and remanded the matters to the Revenue Divisional Officer (RDO), Ranga Reddy (East Division) for ate novo enquiry. By the said order, the Joint collector set aside the orders passed by rdo, dated 31-05-2004. Aggrieved by this order, C. R. P. No. 2755 and 2774 of 2005 are filed. By yet another common order, dated 30-04-2005, the Joint Collector allowed appeals in case No. F2/5768/2004 and in case no. F2/6917/2004, while setting aside the panchanama, dated 30-01-2003, and remanded the matter to Mandal Revenue officer (MRO), Saroor Nagar for passing appropriate orders. This common order is subject matter of C. R. P. Nos. 2775 and 2776 of 2005.
( 2 ) THE brief fact of the matter is not much in dispute. The land admeasuring Acs. 32-02 guntas comprised in survey Nos. 367 to 369 of nadargul village of Saroor Naga
Click Here to Read the rest of this document