L.NARASIMHA REDDY
POLASA RAJALAXMI – Appellant
Versus
M. A. RAHEEM – Respondent
( 2 ) ACCORDING to the appellant, there is a proposed road of 30 feet wide on the rear (southern) side of her house and on the other side of the same, the property of the respondent exists. She stated that she laid a pipeline to drain the water from her house through the said 30 feet road into the surplus water canal of the Bhadrakali tank. The grievance of the appellant was that taking advantage of her absence, the respondent had encroached into about 15 feet of the said proposed road, obstructing her right to utilize the same. With these and other allied facts, the appellant prayed for the relief of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.