SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(AP) 666

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
POLASA RAJALAXMI – Appellant
Versus
M. A. RAHEEM – Respondent


Advocates:
M.CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO, V.PARABRAHMMA SASTRY

( 1 ) THE appellant filed o. S. No. 878 of 1982 in the Court of principal District Munsif, Warangal, against the respondent, for the relief of perpetual injunction, to restrain the latter from interfering with the suit schedule property. The appellant pleaded that she is the owner and possessor of the house bearing no. 15/81/2 of Rangampet, Warangal, and that having purchased the same through sale Deed dated 10-7-1963, she constructed a house soon thereafter. She also pleaded that she purchased the neighbouring piece of the land on the western side through sale Deed, dated 3-4-1964.

( 2 ) ACCORDING to the appellant, there is a proposed road of 30 feet wide on the rear (southern) side of her house and on the other side of the same, the property of the respondent exists. She stated that she laid a pipeline to drain the water from her house through the said 30 feet road into the surplus water canal of the Bhadrakali tank. The grievance of the appellant was that taking advantage of her absence, the respondent had encroached into about 15 feet of the said proposed road, obstructing her right to utilize the same. With these and other allied facts, the appellant prayed for the relief of









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top