SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(AP) 747

V.V.S.RAO
K. MALLIKARJUNA VARA PRASAD – Appellant
Versus
K. POORNACHANDER RAO – Respondent


Advocates:
C.SADASIVA REDDY, M.RAVINDRA NATH REDDY

V. V. S. RAO, J.


( 1 ) THE sole defendant is the appellant. One K. Poorna Chandra rao represented by his General Power of Attorney holder (GPA hodler), Smt P. Santhakumari filed a suit being O. S. No. 67 of 1984 for declaration of title, delivery of possession and mesne profits from June, 1980 till delivery of possession. The Court of subordinate Judge, Markapur, where the suit was instituted, dismissed the suit after regular trial. The Court of Additional district Judge, Ongole, however, allowed the appeal being a. S. No. 43 of 1989 filed by the respondents decreeing the suit. This Judgment of the lower appellate Court is now assailed as vitiated by error of law. At the outset, the fact of the matter as summarized by the trial Court may be stated in brief. The parties are referred to as per the cause title in the suit.

( 2 ) ONE Krishnavajjula Ramabhupala Sarma (Sarma, for brevity), the father of the defendant was the owner of suit schedule land admeasuring Acs. 11. 42 in survey No. 8 situated at narsingapuram village. He allegedly sold the land to the plaintiff under registered sale deed, dated 14. 10. 1963, for a consideration of Rs. 350/ -. Plaintiff took possession and contin














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top