SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(AP) 857

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
MADIPEDDI RAJALINGAM S/O. RAMULU – Appellant
Versus
RUDROJU CHINNA SOMAIAH S/O. VENKAIAH – Respondent


Advocates:
ASHOK REDDY, Ghanshyamdas Mandhani, P.PRATAP REDDY

L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THESE two Second Appeals are filed by the defendant in o. S. No. 66 of 1977 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, at warangal.

( 2 ) THE respondent filed the suit for the relief of eviction of the appellant and any person claiming through him, from the suit schedule property and for recovery of mesne profits, for a period of three years, immediately preceding the date of filing the suit. He pleaded that the appellant is in possession of the suit schedule property with his permission, and when he was asked to vacate it, the respondent claimed that he purchased the land from one Sarvi rajaiah, through unregistered sale deed, dated 19-04-1964 and the said Rajaiah in turn, had purchased it from the respondent, through a similar deed dated 15-05-1960. It was also pleaded that the appellant did not produce any documents, even when required to do so. The respondent claimed that the suit schedule land is his ancestral property and it was mortgaged in favour of g. Venkataiah, somewhere in the year 1954, but was redeemed on 05-05-1953. He contended that the appellant has no right or title over the suit schedule property and that he is liable to be evi













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top