SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(AP) 897

T.CH.SURYA RAO
Tadi Satyanarayana – Appellant
Versus
Maddu Malla Rao – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared
Counsel for the Appellant : Mr.N.Subba Rao
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr.P.Harinath Gupta for R-3.

JUDGMENT

The instant appeal is directed against the order dated 03.09.1999 passed by the learned Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation and AssistantCommissioner of Labour-I Circle, Guntur, in W.C. Case No.335 of 1996.

The unsuccessful applicant is the appellant. He preferred the claim before the Commissioner under the Workmen's Compensation Act (for brevity 'the Act') for an amount of Rs.2 lakhs as compensation for the injuries sustained by him arising out of an accident during the course of his employment. According to him, he was working as Driver of the Zeep bearing No.AP-5T/6073, the original owner of which was the first respondent (Opposite Party No.1) who transferred the Zeep on the same day of his purchase in favour of the second respondent (Opposite Party No.2). The applicant had been working as Driver under Opposite Party No.2 since four months preceding the date of accident. On 02.06.1996 while he was driving the Zeep with passengers and a dead body from Guntur to reach Vemavaram village, at Machavaram village the Zeep fell into a pit and turned turtle and as a result of which the applicant received grievous injuries resulting in permanent disability. A case in crime No








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top