SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(AP) 1036

P.S.NARAYANA
Mudimela Konda Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Gona Nagi Reddy – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared
Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri S.R.Sanku.
Counsel for the Respondents: None appeared.

ORDER

Heard Sri K. Ramesh, representing Sri S.R.Sanku, learned counsel for the revision petitioner. Though the respondents had been served, none represents the respondents.

2. This Court ordered notice before admission on 05.11.2007. The petitioner as plaintiff filed the present civil revision petition under Article 227 of the constitution of India being aggrieved of an order made in I.A.No.126 of 2006 in O.S.No.9 of 2006, dated 11.06.2007. The said application was filed under Order 11 Rules 8 and 11 r/w Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter in short referred 'the Code' for the purpose of convenience) praying for a relief to direct the respondents to report to the Court about the plinth area of respective portions and the floors in their occupation to whom they had leased out and how much rent they have been collecting and how much area is in their personal occupation etc., and the other particulars to enable the petitioner to claim mesne profits and pass such other suitable orders. The learned Judge referred to the judgment in KUCHIMANCHI SUBBA RAO v. KANCHANA PRABHAKARA RAO1 and came to the conclusion that the application made is not in accordance with law


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top