This is a classical case of abuse of process of law. A suit has been filed by the plaintiff in the year 1995 for specific performance on the basis of an alleged agreement of sale, dated 30th of July 1987. When the plaintiff was being examined as a witness, he tried to exhibit the agreement dated 30th July 1987. Objection was raised by the defendant and on 3.8.1999, the trial Court held that the agreement of sale was in fact, a sale deed, but was unregistered and could not be marked. Thereafter, in the year 2001, the plaintiff filed a review petition with an application for condoning the delay. It was dismissed by the trial Court on 4th of February 2002. Again, a revision was filed in the High Court and the High Court dismissed the revision on 4.12.2003. The High Court was of the view that an order in review could not be challenged in the absence of challenge to the original order dated 3.8.1999. Therefore, the petitioner got another chance to file another revision against the order dated 3.8.1999. This order was challenged in C.R.P. No.583 of 2004. The C.R.P. was dismissed by the High Court on 3.11.2005. The petitioner did not lose heart and went to the Supreme Court and f