On 10.11.1998, this Court made the following order:

"In view of the substantial questions of law framed in ground No.6 in the memorandum of grounds of the second appeal, this second appeal is admitted",

The following are the substantial questions of law which had been raised in the said ground No.6 of memorandum of second appeal :

(i) Whether a suit is not maintainable even against an impleaded defendant just because the suit was filed against the wrong defendant (dead person) for lack of knowledge ?

(ii) Whether the entries in Revenue Records coupled with the declaration filed under A.P. Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings) Act and the computation of the land to the holding is not sufficient to establish the factum of possession for the lands in dispute ?

(iii) Whether the Courts below were right in construing the possession of persons claiming through the plaintiff as that of strangers and is not accountable for claiming adverse possession ?

(iv) Whether the Courts below were right in holding that the declaration made under a State Enactment Le., A.P. Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings) Act does not bind the defendant simply because he is not put on no