C.Y.SOMAYAJULU
K. Veeraprasad Rao – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Prohibition – Respondent
1. Questioning the order of confiscation of the tractor and trailer belonging to the petitioners by the 2nd respondent, which was confirmed by the 1st respondent in an appeal preferred by them, petitioners filed this writ petition.
2. The case of the petitioners is that inasmuch as no contraband was seized from the tractor and trailer they are not liable for confiscation under the provisions of the A.P. Excise Act (the Act).
3. The case of the respondents is that on reliable information that an illegal toddy depot where toddy mixed with chloral hydrate was being sold, they went to that place and found toddy being sold in a hut and a tractor and trailer in front of that hut without any attendant there and so they seized all the bottles, tubs etc., found in the hut and tractor and trailer also as it was used for carrying the illicit toddy and issued notice to the owners of the tractor and trailer to show cause why the tractor and trailer cannot be confiscated and having considered their explanation, which is not satisfactory, they confiscated the tractor and trailer of the petitioners.
4. On my directions the learned Government Pleader produced the relevant file, which contain
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.