SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(AP) 1089

G.S.SINGHVI
S. Anjaiah (died) – Appellant
Versus
Vinay Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Counsel for Petitioners: Sri M.Rama Rao
Counsel for Respondents:Sri C.V.Mohan Reddy, Advocate General

ORDER

Per C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J.

1. This contempt case is filed to punish the respondents for willful violation of the judgment dated 01.3.2005 in Writ Appeal No.333 of 2005 and the directions contained in the order dated 05.12.2005 in C.C.No.1165 of 2005.

2. The contempt case was originally filed by Sri S.Anjaiah, the appellant in Writ Appeal No.333 of 2005 and petitioner in W.P.No.19224 of 2004. As Sri Anjaiah died during the pendency of the contempt case, petitioners 2 to 6 came on record as per the order dated 13.3.2007 of this Court as his legal representatives.

3. The facts in brief are narrated hereunder: S.Anjaiah (hereinafter referred to as "writ petitioner") filed W.P.No.19224 of 2004 for a writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in not paying compensation amount of Rs.88,69,320/- to him towards the value of the extent of 583 square metres equivalent to 694 square yards carved out of Survey No.385/386/I/P, 447, 448 and 449 in T.S.Nos.156, 157 and 158 Block-A, Ward No.165, situated at Amberpet village and Mandal, Hyderabad District, as arbitrary and illegal and for a direction to the respondents to pay the said amount with interest at 18% per

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top