A.GOPAL REDDY
Grandhi Narayana Chetty – Appellant
Versus
Mitta Lokesh – Respondent
Plaintiff is in revision against the order passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Tirupati in an unnumbered suit (R.R.No.2598 of 2007) filed for recovery of Rs.6.00 lakhs on the basis of ten promissory notes executed by defendant-respondent, whereby the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge ordered for payment of Court fee separately on each of the ten promissory notes as per Section 6(3) (a) of A.P. Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act granting time till 17.7.2007.
2. The petitioner herein filed a suit before the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Tirupathi for recovery of a sum of Rs.6.00 lakhs based on ten promissory notes executed by the defendant herein, out of which, two promissory notes are executed for Rs.1.00 lakh each and the remaining eight promissory notes are executed for Rs.50,000/- each, alleging that the said amounts are borrowed by the defendant on the same day i.e. 27.10.2004 executing separate promissory notes. In paragraph 3 of the plaint it is stated that the defendant borrowed a sum of Rs.6.00 lakhs on 27.2.2004 for business purpose from the plaintiff and executed two promissory notes of Rs.1.00 lakh each and eight promissory notes of Rs.5
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.