SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(AP) 1011

A.GOPAL REDDY
Grandhi Narayana Chetty – Appellant
Versus
Mitta Lokesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared ;
Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri O Manohar Reddy
Counsel for the respondent: None

ORDER

Plaintiff is in revision against the order passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Tirupati in an unnumbered suit (R.R.No.2598 of 2007) filed for recovery of Rs.6.00 lakhs on the basis of ten promissory notes executed by defendant-respondent, whereby the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge ordered for payment of Court fee separately on each of the ten promissory notes as per Section 6(3) (a) of A.P. Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act granting time till 17.7.2007.

2. The petitioner herein filed a suit before the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Tirupathi for recovery of a sum of Rs.6.00 lakhs based on ten promissory notes executed by the defendant herein, out of which, two promissory notes are executed for Rs.1.00 lakh each and the remaining eight promissory notes are executed for Rs.50,000/- each, alleging that the said amounts are borrowed by the defendant on the same day i.e. 27.10.2004 executing separate promissory notes. In paragraph 3 of the plaint it is stated that the defendant borrowed a sum of Rs.6.00 lakhs on 27.2.2004 for business purpose from the plaintiff and executed two promissory notes of Rs.1.00 lakh each and eight promissory notes of Rs.5















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top