SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(AP) 1237

A.GOPAL REDDY
K. Errappa – Appellant
Versus
N. Narayana Murthy – Respondent


Advocates:
Sri R.Radhakrishna Reddy - Counsel for the Petitioner:
K.S.Gopala Krishnan for Sri N. Pramod - Counsel for the Respondents 7 to 12:Advocate

Order:- This is an application to add respondents 7 to 12 as the legal representatives of the deceased third respondent herein to the main revision petition.

2. When the revision petition was taken up for admission and disposal, on issuance of notice, Sri K.S. Gopala Krishnan, learned counsel for the proposed parties insisted for an order on the impleadment petition.

3. The facts giving rise to filing of this revision petition, are, briefly, as under:

The first revision petitioner herein is the decree-holder and the respondents herein are the judgment debtors in EP No.1/1999 in ATC No.1/1984 on the file of Special Officer-cum- Principal Junior Civil Judge, Madanapalle.

4. The first petitioner-cultivating tenant filed ATC No.1/1984 under Sec.16 of the A.P. (Andhra Area) Tenancy Act, 1956 to declare him as a cultivating tenant; to continue in possession and to grant permanent injunction and also to declare the sale deeds in favour of the respondents 2 to 6 as nominal and void. The Special Officer-cum-Principal Junior Civil Judge, Madanapalli decreed the claim of the petitioner directing him to
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top