A.GOPAL REDDY
K. Errappa – Appellant
Versus
N. Narayana Murthy – Respondent
2. When the revision petition was taken up for admission and disposal, on issuance of notice, Sri K.S. Gopala Krishnan, learned counsel for the proposed parties insisted for an order on the impleadment petition.
3. The facts giving rise to filing of this revision petition, are, briefly, as under:
The first revision petitioner herein is the decree-holder and the respondents herein are the judgment debtors in EP No.1/1999 in ATC No.1/1984 on the file of Special Officer-cum- Principal Junior Civil Judge, Madanapalle.
4. The first petitioner-cultivating tenant filed ATC No.1/1984 under Sec.16 of the A.P. (Andhra Area) Tenancy Act, 1956 to declare him as a cultivating tenant; to continue in possession and to grant permanent injunction and also to declare the sale deeds in favour of the respondents 2 to 6 as nominal and void. The Special Officer-cum-Principal Junior Civil Judge, Madanapalli decreed the claim of the petitioner directing him to
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.