SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(AP) 96

C.Y.SOMAYAJULU
D. Yadamma – Appellant
Versus
G. SuryaIiarayana – Respondent


Advocates appeared:G. Dhananjai, Counsel for the Petitioner.

ORDER :- The first respondent filed the suit against the revision petitioners and the second respondent for injunction restraining them from interfering with his possession over 537.25 Sq. yards in Sy. No.313 of Chandanagar Village within the boundaries mentioned in the schedule appended to the plaint, which hereinafter will be called as the suit land, inter alia alleging that he purchased the suit land under a registered document in 1967 from one V. Venkat Ramaiah, who had purchased the same in 1965 from the original owners of the land, namely Donti Narsaiah and his sons namely Veeraiah, Shankeraiah, Ramu/u and Kistaiah and that those people, i.e., Donti Narsaiah and his sons also sold an extent of 537.25 Sq.yards to one V. Radha Krishna Murthy, who is the eastern side neighbour to the suit land and the said Radha Krishna Murthy developed the property and constructed a residential apartment with the name Balaji Apartment and subsequently, he constructed a compound wall to protect the suit land and that the revision petitioners, who are his neighbours, are trying to encroach upon the suit land in spite of his protest.

2. In the above suit, first respondent filed a petition under Ord







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top