SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(AP) 1254

BILAL NAZKI
M. Nirmala – Appellant
Versus
Gandla Balakotiah – Respondent


Advocates appeared:(Mrs.) M. Venkateswari, Counsel for the Petitioner; (Ms.) G. Sudha, Counsel for the Respondent.

ORDER :- This is a revision filed by the petitioner against an order passed in I.A. No.330 of 2007 in F.C.O.P. No.186 of 2007. The petitioner and respondent are husband and wife. The wife filed an application under Order 39 read with Section 151 of C.P.C. seeking an injunction against her husband from dispossessing her from the schedule property. In this connection, she relied on Section 19 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (for short, 'the Act'). In her affidavit before the trial Court, she stated that she had filed an O.P. for perpetual injunction. She submitted that respondent had purchased the schedule property from out of the funds given by her and her family members, but the property was purchased in the name of the respondent in the year 1996. From February, 1997, she was staying in the said property. The same was their matrimonial home. Due to the differences between the couple, they started living separately. She continued to liv.e in the same house. She submitted that the respondent had been resorting to several tactics in order to dispossess her from the petition schedule property and he was sending strangers to the house, who, in turn, were cla




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top