P.S.NARAYANA
Gaddam Buchanna – Appellant
Versus
M. Rajagopala Chary – Respondent
2. Heard Sri G. Anandam, the learned Counsel representing the revision petitioner in both the civil revision petitions and Sri Anand Kumar Kapur, who had lodged caveat on behalf of respondents in both these civil revision petitions.
3. In view of the commonality of the facts, both these civil revision petitions are being disposed of by a common order.
4. CRP No.5205 of 2007 is filed as against an order made in IA NoJ08 of 2007 in OS No. 30 of 2001 on the file of the Court of Junior Civil Judge, Gadwal, Mahbubnagar District. Likewise, CRP No.5206 of 2007 is filed as against as order made in IA No.309 of 2007 in OS No.29 of2001 on the file of the Court of Junior Civil Judge, Gadwal, Mahbubnagar District.
5. In both these matters, the revision petitioner is the defendant in both the suits, who filed applications under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter referred to for short as 'The Code' for the purpose of convenience) praying for amendment of written statement in the respective suits.
6. The plaintiff in OS No.30 of 2001 is Mr. M. Rajagopala Chary and the plaintiff in OS No.29 of 2001 i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.