N.V.RAMANA
Shetty Chandra Shekar – Appellant
Versus
Neeti Ramulu – Respondent
2. The petitioners are the plaintiffs while the respondents are the defendants. It is the contention of the petitioners-plaintiffs that the Court below committed an error in allowing the present petition in I.A. No.54 of 2007 filed by the respondents defendants, and as such, it is liable to be set aside; while it is the contention of the respondents-defendants that the Court below in exercise of its discretion under Order XIX Rule 2 C.P.C. has rightly allowed the I.A., the same being valid and in accordance with law, no interference is called for therewith, and the C.R.P. be dismissed.
3. Before adverting to the legal principle involved in this case, for better appreciation and adjudication of the matter in dispute, it is just and necessary, to refer to the relevant facts.
4. The present petition in I.A. No. 54 of 2007
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.