SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(AP) 823

G.YETHIRAJULU
K. SIVAKANTH REDDY – Appellant
Versus
P. RAMANJANEYULU – Respondent


( 1 ) THIS Civil Revision Petition has been filed by the plaintiffs in o. S. No. 245 of 2007 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge at Bhongir, nalgonda District.

( 2 ) THE plaintiffs filed the above suit for injunction. Along with the plaint, they filed an agreement of sale and some other documents. During pendency of the suit, the counsel for the plaintiffs filed a Memo stating that the matter is settled amicably out of Court and the plaintiffs intends to withdraw the suit as not pressed. In view of the Memo and in the presence of both parties, the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Bhongir dismissed the suit as not pressed without costs, through the order dated 13. 07. 2007. Later the plaintiffs filed I. A. No. 656 of 2007 under Order 13, Rule VII (2) read with section 151 of C. P. C. requesting the Court to return the unmarked documents including the agreement of sale dated 17. 10. 2006. The trial Court ordered return of documents 2 to 5 and in respect of document No. 1 i. e. , agreement of sale, the trial Court withheld the same observing that the document is insufficiently stamped and the same has to be treated as a document under section 47 (A) of the Indian Stamp Act a


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top