G.ROHINI
KONETI RAMACHANDRA – Appellant
Versus
SPECIAL OFFICER-CUM-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT MUNSIF, CHITTOOR DISTRICT – Respondent
( 2 ) THE facts, in brief, are as under : the father of the petitioners by name koneti Narayana Swamy along with one manikyarayappa was cultivating the lands belonging to Rani Nanjammanni. After the death of Manikyarayappa, the father of the petitioners, Narayana Swamy, continued in possession and enjoyment of the lands in question as the cultivating tenant. While so, the landlady Rani Nanjammanni died and the respondents 3 and 4 herein claiming title to the lands in question under a Will said to have been executed by rani Nanjammanni attempted to interfere with the possession of Narayana Swamy. In the circumstances, he filed O. S. No. 100 of 1979 in the Court of District Munsif, punganur, which was renumbered as O. S. No. 429 of 1979 on the file of the Court of principal District Munsif, Mandanapalle, seeking perpetual injunction restraining the respondents 3 and 4 from interfering with his possession. Pending the said suit, narayana Swamy, the father of the petitioners, died on 11. 10. 1984 and the petitioners were
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.