( 1 ) AS the three appeals are connected and arise out of the same accident and the Court below disposed of the matters by common judgment, all the three appeals are also being disposed of by this common judgment.

( 2 ) THE Insurance Company is the appellant in all the three appeals. CMA no. 30/2000 is filed challenging the order dated 30. 8. 1999 passed by the Court of additional District Judge, Medak at Sangareddy in O. P. No. 32/1999 in granting compensation of Rs. 50,000/- under Section 140 of Motor vehicles Act, 1988,

( 3 ) MA CMA Nos. 2739 and 2740 of 2006 have been filed challenging the common order dated 5. 5. 2005 passed by the Motor Vehicles Accident Claims tribunal-cum-III Additional District and sessions Judge (FTC) at Medak in M. V. O. P. Nos. 33/1999 and 128/2004.

( 4 ) IT appears that the deceased had two wives and both the wives filed different claim petitions in different Courts and by virtue of the orders of this Court dated 10. 2. 2003 in Tr. CMP No. 412/2002, both the claim petitions were clubbed and the evidence was recorded in OP No. 33 of 1999.

( 5 ) THE case of the claimants is that while the deceased was coming back from shankarampet on his luna on 17. 1

Click Here to Read the rest of this document