SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(AP) 388

G.YETHIRAJULU
Janapati Jaipal Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Sannihita Chit Funds Pvt. Limited, Rep. By its Foreman – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Vedula Srinivas, Advocate Counsel for respondents

ORDER:

This Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the order in E.P.

No.116 of 2007 in O.S. No.58 of 2002 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Karimnagar District.

2. The plaintiff filed the suit for recovery of money and it was decreed for an amount of Rs.2,87,471/- with interest. The decree holder filed E.P. No.116 of 2007 in the same Court which passed the decree for realization of Rs.4,92,059/- towards the amount covered by the decree with interest and costs by way of attachment of the salary of the petitioner. The revision petitioner being J.Dr. in the said E.P. challenged the order on the ground that the E.P. is not maintainable as he is working in Adilabad District, which is beyond the jurisdiction of the Karimnagar Court and the execution proceedings ought to have been taken only after the transfer of the decree in the local Court of Adilabad District, therefore, he requested to set aside the order passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Karimnagar, in E.P. No.116 of 2007 in O.S. No.58 of 2002.

3. The learned Counsel for the respondent - decree-holder submitted that there is no need for transfer of the case to the District in which the J.Dr. is working for the purpose of a

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top