C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
Katamreddi Vasundhara – Appellant
Versus
Joint Collector, Ananthapur – Respondent
2. Heard Sri P. Kamalakar, learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies.
3. Based on the report of the Tahsildar, Putlur, respondent No.2 framed five charges against the petitioner, which read as under:
Charge 1: That the F.P. Shop Dealer has not distributing the Essential Commodities properly to the cardholders. Thereby the F.P. Shop Dealer violated clause 22(vii) of A.P.s.P.D.s. (Control) Order, 2001.
Charge 2: That the F.P. Shop Dealer is selling the stocks Le., K.Oil 3 days only and rice 3 days only. Thereby the F.P. Shop Dealer has violated condition 4(i)(ii) of A.P.S.P.D.S.
(Control) Order 2001.
Charge 3: That the F.P. Shop Dealer collecting the coupons without issuing stocks. Thereby the F.P. Shop Dealer has violated the condition 17 of A.P.S.P.D.S.
(Control) Order 2001.
Charge 4: That the F.P. Shop Dealer is selling rice at Rs.6.00 and K.Oil at Rs.0.5
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.