As these revisions are interrelated they are disposed of by this common order.

2. Facts, in brief, are: Revision petitioner filed the suit in O.S.No.1 of 1995 on the file of the Court of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Nellore, initially against her parents i.e. the defendants 1 and 2 and the subsequent purchasers as defendants 3 and 4, for a declaration that the suit schedule house was given to her by her parents at the time of marriage towards pasupu kunkuma and that the sale made by her father in favour of defendants 3 and 4 is null and void. As defendants 1 and 2 died during the pendency of the said suit, she brought the legal representatives i.e. her brother and sisters as defendant Nos.5 to 11. According to the petitioner-plaintiff her parents gave the suit house to her, at the time of marriage i.e. as early as in 1976 and the said house was let out to the husband of eleventh respondent and eleventh respondent with her husband is residing in the said house. It is also the case of the petitioner-plaintiff that the husband of eleventh respondent executed a lease deed in her favour and eleventh respondent and her husband are paying rents regularly and first defendant, the