This Revision Petition has been filed by the third defendant in O.S.No.230 of 2001 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Peddapalli against the orders of the said Court, dated 13-02-2008.

2. The plaintiff filed the suit for perpetual injunction. During the course of evidence, DW-1 was examined and through him, the defendants sought to mark a xerox copy of an unregistered sale deed. The plaintiff's counsel raised an objection that the document is not properly stamped; that it is an unregistered document; that the document is not properly visible and that it is not admissible in evidence, therefore, it shall not be marked. After hearing both parties, the Court passed the following order:

"The document executed by D.W.1 as Ex.B11 is seems to be a Xerox copy said to be executed on a Non-Judl. Stamp paper of Rs.20/-. The said document said to be executed on 13-11-1991, but the stamp paper purchased on 13-1-1992, further it is the contention of D.W.1 that he handed over the original to P.W.1 for the purpose of registration, but she refused to register it and retained by her. Not-withstanding to whereabouts the original, in my opinion, Ex.B11 is not admissible in evidence even as