SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(AP) 553

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
Boddupalli Sathaiah – Appellant
Versus
Koppula Pedda Linga Reddy – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER: Mr. K. Venu Madhav
COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENTS: Mr. Abhishek Reddy and G.P. for Revenue

ORDER

This writ petition is filed, against the order dated 3.7.2000, passed by the Joint Collector, R-15. The genesis of the proceedings, in brief, is as under. One Thakur Devi Singh was the pattadar of an extent of Acs.82-13 gts., in Survey Nos.1443, etc. of Arjalabavi, hamlet of Panagal village, Nalgonda Mandal and District. Koppula Narsaiah, Veeraiah, Ramaiah, Venkataiah and Lingaiah, the ancestors of respondents 1 to 12, were declared as protected tenants, in respect of Acs.3-34 gts. in Sy.No.1445, under the A.P. (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 (for short "the Tenancy Act"). They were also issued certificates, under Section 38-E of that Act on 30.10.1975.

2. One Smt. Bharathi Bai challenged the certificates issued in favour of the predecessor-in-title, by filing an appeal before the Joint Collector. The appeal was rejected, and thereupon, she filed C.R.P.No. 2636 of 1985, before this Court. The revision was also dismissed on 8.4.1993. Despite the same, she claimed ownership rights over an extent of Acs.3-34 gts. in Sy.No.1445. She has also executed a sale deed in favour of the petitioners herein, on 16.8.1996. On the basis of the claim made by Bharathi







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top