T.MEENA KUMARI, P.V.SANJAY KUMAR
Mandal Revenue Officer, Visakhapatnam (Rural), Visakhapatnam – Appellant
Versus
Kanchubriki Parvathamma – Respondent
2. Writ Appeal No.914 of 2002 is filed by the Mandal Revenue Officer, Visakhapatnam (Rural), Visakhapatnam, the petitioner in W.P. No.22862 of 2001, while Writ Appeal No.958 of 2002 is filed by the Joint Collector and Settlement Officer, Visakhapatnam, and the Mandal Revenue Officer (Rural), Visakhapatnam-the respondents in W.P. No.4038 of 2000. The petitioners in W.P. No.4038 of 2000, being the Respondents 1 to 3 in W.P. No.22862 of 2001, are the respondents before us in both the appeals. In addition, the Commissioner of Appeals, Office of the Chief Commissioner of Land Administration, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad, Respondent No.4 in W.P. No.22862 of 2001 is arrayed as Respondent No.4 in W.A. No.914 of 2002.
3. By the common order dated 4th January, 2002, the learned Judge allowed 224 W.P. NoA038 of 2000, directing the respondents therein to mutate the names of the writ petitioners in the Revenue records, giving effect to the patta granted to their ancestors in the year 1959 and dismissed W.P. No.22862 o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.