P.SWAROOP REDDY
D. Vijay Saradhi Raju – Appellant
Versus
Srilatha Dupati – Respondent
This petition is field by the petitioner/ A4 for quashing the proceedings in Cr.No.74 of 2008 on the file of the Central Crime Station, Hyderabad.
2. Thepetitioner/A4 is the younger brother Al and he is an Advocate by profession. It may not be highly relevant; but it is stated by the learned Counsel for 91 the petitioner that he had been selected as a Junior Civil Judge and on account of pendency of these proceedings; he is not given appointment orders.
3. The case of the de facto complainant is that - her marriage with A1 took place on 9.8.2006 at Hyderabad; Al at that time as residing in London; herself and 98 2008(2) ALD (Crt) August her family members were mislead by all the accused, including the present petitioner, stating that Al was a C.A. and M.B.A., working in London getting salary Of 40,000.00 pounds per annum; some time after the marriage, she was taken to London with great reluctance by A1 there she was harassed continuously, as Al had intimacy with AS, with whom he was living like a spouse; she was put to untold miseries by AI; she was not allowed to visit her mother in India, who was suffering from Cancer and that all the accused, including the present petitio
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.