SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(AP) 603

N.V.RAMANA
Yadla Ramesh Naidu, S/o Demudu Naidu – Appellant
Versus
Sub-Registrar, Sabbavaram, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Counsel for Petitioner: Sri Srinivas Dammalapati
Counsel for Respondents 1 to 4: GP for Revenue
Counsel for Respondents 5 to 8: Sri S.V. Bhatt
Counsel for Respondent No.9: Sri K. Rama Mohan Mahadeva

Judgement Key Points

What is the effect of mere registration under the Registration Act, 1908 on title to property? What is the power and scope of a Registering Officer to go into title disputes or refuse registration based on objections by third parties? What constitutes valid grounds for refusal or acceptance of registration under the Registration Act and AP Rules, including application of VA3 Adangals, Pattadar Passbooks, and government memos?

What is the effect of mere registration under the Registration Act, 1908 on title to property?

What is the power and scope of a Registering Officer to go into title disputes or refuse registration based on objections by third parties?

What constitutes valid grounds for refusal or acceptance of registration under the Registration Act and AP Rules, including application of VA3 Adangals, Pattadar Passbooks, and government memos?


Order:

The petitioner claims to be the absolute owner and in possession of an extent of Acs. 2-01 cents in Sy. No. 29; Acs. 5-40 cents in Sy. Nos. 239/9 to 20; Acs. 6- 00 cents in Sy. No. 282/1 (old 93/4); Acs. 7-82 cents in Sy. Nos. 277/1 to 11 (old 26/3 & 4); Acs. 17-22 cents in Sy. Nos. 93/2 to 38 and Acs. 19-09 cents in Sy. Nos. 26/1 and 2, totaling Acs. 57-54 cents of Gollapalem village, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam, having purchased the same from his vendors, namely Garlapati Ramesh and others, under six registered sale deeds dated 25.08.2003. The petitioner states that originally his vendors were given ryotwari pattas under Section 4 of Andhra Inams (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1956 in respect of the above lands.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner having agreed to sell the aforementioned lands owned by him to one Sri. G. Goutham and others, having received the sale consideration, executed sale deeds in their favour. After executing the sale deeds, when he approached respondent No.1 to ascertain the procedure for getting the sale deeds registered, respondent No.1 informed him that unless VA-3 Adangals relating to the lands


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top