This revision is preferred by the tenant against the order of eviction passed by the learned Additional Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad, in R.A. No. 4 of 2001, dated 15-2-2005, setting aside the dismissal order of the learned III Additional Rent Controller passed in R.C. No. 528 of 1996, dated 11-10-2000.

2. The tenant is the petitioner and the respondent is the landlady. The parties are herein after referred to as landlady and tenant, respectively, for the sake of convenience.

3. The brief facts of the case are as follows:-

The respondent herein is the owner and landlady of the schedule premises, which was gifted to her by her mother under a registered gift deed, EX.P-1, dated 27 -12-1988. The tenant is in possession of the premises under a rental deed, Ex.P-3, in Urdu with its true translation being EX.P-4, dated 16-01-1962. The case of the landlady in brief is that her husband who is a qualified civil engineer, has since retired and wishes to provide consultancy services in civil works, to maintain the family, and as such, the premises is bona fide required by her. She claims that she does not have any other premises. It is also claimed that the schedule mulgi