These three revisions arise out of three separate orders passed by the Court of III Additional Junior Civil Judge, Kadapa. Hence, they are disposed of through a common order.

2. Defendants 1 and 2 are the petitioners in all the revisions. The 151 respondent is the pI.A.intiff and 2nd respondent is defendant No.3.

3. The 151 respondent filed the suit, with a prayer to set aide the sale deeds executed by the 2nd respondent in favour of the petitioners. The trial of the suit commenced and the evidence was closed. At that stage, the 15t respondent filed three applications; I.A.No.1274 of 2007 was filed under Order 18 Rule 17 C.P.C. with a prayer to recall P.W.1, for the purpose of marking certain documents, I.A.No.1275 of 2007 was filed with a prayer to condone the deI.A.y in filing the documents under Order 7 Rule 14 C.P.C., and I.A.No.1292 of 2007 was filed with a prayer to reopen the evidence, for the purpose of marking certain documents. Through separate orders, dated 22.01.2008, the trial Court allowed I.A.Nos.1275 and 1292 of 2007. C.R.P.Nos.2455 and 2590 of 2008 are filed against the said orders. On the next day, i.e., 23.01.2008, the trial Court allowed I.A.No.1274 of 2008.