T.MEENA KUMARI, RAMESH RANGANATHAN
ALIND Workers Congress rep. by its Secretary – Appellant
Versus
United Shippers Limited, Mumbai – Respondent
(Per Ramesh Ranganathan, J.)
Would location at Hyderabad of two divisions, and the assets therein, of a Sick Industrial Company registered in the State of Kerala, and the petitioner having submitted their bid for its take-over, based on which the Board of Industrial and Financial Reconstruction, (for short 'the S.I.F.R'), had sanctioned a separate scheme, constitute "cause of action in part", for invoking the jurisdiction of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh in a Writ Petition filed challenging the order of the Appellate Authority, (for short "the A.A.I.F.R"), under the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 (for short 'SICA'), dated 06.02.2007 setting aside the order of the S.I.F.R. dated 26.07.2005?
2. An ancillary question which falls for consideration is whether, in the absence of any plea that the "cause of action", even in part, had arisen within its territorial limits, this Court would be justified in placing reliance on the list of dates and events annexed thereto, and the material documents filed therewith, to determine whether or not "cause of action" in part has arisen within its territorial limits?
3. The 5th respondent herein is a company registe
Eastern Coalfields Ltd. v. Kalyan Banerjee
Mustafa Hussain Vs Union of India (UOI)
OIL AND NATURAL GAS COMMISSION Vs UTPAL KUMAR BASU
BLOOM DEKOR LIMITED Vs SUBHASH HIMATLAL DESAI
SOUTH EAST ASIA SHIPPING COMPANY LIMITED Vs NAV BHARAT ENTERPRISES Private Limited
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.