SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(AP) 1044

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
Bijivemula Venkata Subba Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Jangam Satya Babu – Respondent


Advocates appeared:For the Petitioner:L.J. Veera Reddy, Advocate. For the Respondents: --

Judgment :

The respondents filed O.S.No.89 of 2002 in the Court of Junior Civil Judge, Badvel, against the petitioner, for the relief of perpetual injunction, in respect of the suit schedule property. The petitioner, on the other hand, presented a counter-claim, for that very relief. The trial Court dismissed the suit and decreed the counter-claim.

The respondents filed A.S.No.5 of 2008 in the Court of Additional Senior Civil Judge-cum-Fast Track Court, Rajampet at Badvel. After some time, they filed I.A.No.37 of 2008, under Order XXIII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), with a prayer to permit them to withdraw the appeal, without prejudice to the right to file a fresh suit for declaration of title and recovery of possession, in respect of the suit schedule property. The petitioner opposed the application, stating that the valuable rights have accrued to him, on account of the decree passed in his counter-claim and the same cannot be defeated by according permission to the respondents, enabling them to file a fresh suit. Through an elaborate order, dated 15.07.2008, the lower Appellate Court allowed the I.A. The same is challenged in this C.R.P.

Sri L.J.Veera Reddy,





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top