SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(AP) 199

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
P. Suresh – Appellant
Versus
A. P. State, rep. , by its District Collector – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
For the Petitioners:K. Rama Mohan Mahadeva, Advocate. For the Respondents: G.P. for Revenue.

Judgment :

Strange are the ways, in which the authorities of the Revenue Department would defeat the rights of the citizens. To trample upon the rights, they would go to any extent. If any instance is needed, this writ petition provides for one.

One Sri Mamillapalli Subbaiah and Mallkka were the owners of Ac.5.03 cents of land in Survey No.602 of Proddutur Village in the year 1932. Transactions in relation to that land took place in the years 1935, 1939, 1944, 1945 and 1963 through different sale deeds. The petitioners purchased about Ac.1.13 cents of land from different persons or agencies through sale deeds dated 14.03.2006, 18.04.2006 and 03.03.2008. They intended to sell the land to others. For this purpose, they approached the Office of Joint Sub-Registrar-I, Proddutur, 3rd respondent herein either for collecting necessary information or for presentation of documents. They were however informed that the Tahsildar, Praddutur, 2nd respondent herein addressed a letter dated 09.09.2008 to the District Collector, 1st respondent herein stating that as per the revenue records, the land in Survey No.602 belongs to Government and on that basis, 3rd respondent refused either to furnish i










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top