SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(AP) 1094

THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY AND THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
Gangula Venkateswara Reddy and others. - Appellant
Vs.
State of Andhra Pradesh - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No.1339 of 2006
Decided on : 24-12-2008

Advocates Appeared:
Counsel for appellants: Sri C.Padmanabha Reddy, learned Senior Counsel for Sri C. Praveen Kumar
Counsel for respondents: Additional Public Prosecutor

Headnote:a) INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860, Sections 302, 148 - Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Section 3(2)(v) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Sections 161, 173 and 207 - Evidence Act, 1872, Section 145 - Constitution of India, Article21:- Non-furnishing of the statements recorded under Section 161 to the accused which are not favorable to the prosecution is denying a fair opportunity to the accused to cross examine the witnesses in the trial and hence conviction is vitiated.

       b) INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860, Sections 302, 148 - Evidence Act, 1872, Section 3 - Where it is alleged that the deceased was chased while he was driving moped and killed by the accused and in spite of phone connection in the village as well as in the house of the deceased, the police were not informed of the occurrence over phone, nor anybody in the village informed of the incident, and the delay in filing FIR along with other facts of the case raises suspicions, the conviction of the accused is not sustainable.

       c) SCHEDULED CASTES AND SCHEDULED TRIBES (PREVENTION OF ATROCITIES) ACT, 1989, Section 3(2)(v) – Where the prosecution failed to establish commission of an offence under IPC against the accused, the trial court can not by any stretch of imagination convict the accused of an offence under Section 3(2)(v)Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act

Oral Judgment: (Per Hon'ble Sri Justice A.Gopal Reddy)

This appeal under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is preferred by A-1, A-2, A-4 to A-6 against the judgment dt. 18-9- 2006 passed in SC ST SC No.32/2005 on the file of Special Judge for SC & ST (POA) Act-cum-VI Additional District & Sessions Judge, Kurnool.

The appellants/A-1, A-2, A4 to A-6 along with A-3 who were tried for the offences punishable under Section 302 IPC, alternatively, under Sec. 3(2)(v) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short "the Act") and 148 IPC. The learned trial court convicted the appellants for the offence under Section 3 (2) (v) of the Act and Sec.148 IPC and sentenced them to suffer rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs.1000/- each in default to suffer simple imprisonment for a period of six months each and further convicted them for the offence under Sc. 148 IPC and sentenced them to suffer rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year and to pay a fine of Rs.500/- each in default to suffer simple imprisonment for a period of three months each by the impugned judgment.

The substance of the charge against the accused is that on 6-3-2004 near the field of Balija Veerappa in between Obulapuram and Thadakanapalli villages, they committed murder of Rogenna, who belonged to a member of Scheduled Caste, (hereinafter referred to as "the deceased") intentionally by beating and stabbing him with pattudu sticks and knife.

The case of the prosecution in brief is that, A-1 committed rape on one Rani, who is the daughter of the junior paternal uncle of the deceased Rogenna, for which the deceased was eye witness. A case in crime in Cr.No.19/2002 under Section 376 IPC was registered against A-1. After committal, the case ie., SC No.1/2003 was coming up for trial on 4-3-2004. A-1 and his relatives mooted a compromise with the deceased, for which, the deceased put a condition that A-1 should marry the victim girl Rani by taking Rs.25,000/- as dowry. A-1 and his relatives did not accept the proposal of the deceased on the ground that Rani belonged to Scheduled Caste. Due to that they gave threat to the deceased. As there was no compromise in SC No.1/2003, the case was adjourned to 8-3-2004. While so on 6-3-2004, the deceased and his brother Harijana Sagidipogu Yesanna @ Sanjanna (P.W.1) went to their field at about 5 PM to watch the ground nut crop. The land of Harijana Sagidipogu Ramudu (P.W.2), who is the son of the junior paternal uncle of the deceased, is also situated by the side of the land of P.W.1. After sitting for some time at their field, the deceased P.Ws.1 and 2 were proceeding to the village on their moped, which was driven by the deceased. At about 7 PM when they reached near the land of Balija Veeramma, A-1 to A-6 formed themselves into an unlawful assembly armed with sticks and knives stopped the moped. Immediately after stopping the vehicle, P.Ws.1 and 2 got down from the vehicle. A-1 and A-2 beat the deceased with sticks on the back of the head and caused him injuries. Then A-3 to A-6 attacked the deceased and beat him and stabbed him with sticks and daggers. All the accused threw the dead body of the deceased into a pit by the side of the road. After damaging the moped they threw it in the land of Veeramma and went away from that place. P.Ws.1 and 2 went near the deceased and found him dead. Due to fear, P.Ws.1 and 2 went back to their field where the father of deceased-P.W.3 was staying and informed him of the incident. On his advise, out of fear, they remained at the field till the next day morning. On the next day morning, P.Ws.1 to 3 came to the scene of offence and found the dead body. P.Ws.1 and 2 while keeping P.W.3 to watch the dead body went into the village and informed the incident to the wife of the deceased and her relatives. Thereupon, P.W.1 went to the police station and gave Ex.P-1 written complaint before the Assistant Sub-Inspector of Police-P.W.11


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top