SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(AP) 865

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
G. Nagabhushanam – Appellant
Versus
T. Eswaramma – Respondent


Advocates appeared:For the Petitioner:V.R. Reddy Kovvuri, Advocate.

Judgment :-

(Petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India to revise the order dated:24/06/2008 and made in I.A.No.664/2008 in I.A.No.1343 of 2007 in O.S.No.214 of 2005 on the file of the court of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kadapa.)

Common Order:

The three revisions are filed by the defendant in O.S.No.214 of 2005.

The respondent filed the suit, against the petitioner, for the relief of perpetual injunction, in respect of the land in Sy.Nos.930 and 931 of Chinnachowk village of Kadapa District. The petitioner filed I.A.No.1343 of 2007, under Order XXVI Rule 9 C.P.C., with a prayer to appoint an Advocate Commissioner, to measure the suit schedule property as well as the neighbouring land in Sy.Nos.1043 and 1044, with the help of Mandal Surveyor. The

The respondent filed C.R.P.No.5589 of 2007, against the order in I.A.No.1343 of 2007. Her grievance was that the order passed by the trial court enabled the petitioner herein to gather evidence. The CRP was allowed by this court on 15.2.2008, and the order dated 3.11.2007, was set aside. The trial court was directed to pass fresh orders in I.A.No.1343 of 2007.

In pursuance of the directions issued by this court in C.R.P.No.55









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top