Common Order:

C.R.P.No.614 of 2009 is filed by the revision petitioner-defendant being aggrieved upon an order dated 20-11-2008 made in I.A.No.583 of 2008 in O.S.No.416 of 2006 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Adoni. Likewise C.R.P.No.717 of 2009 is filed by the self same revision petitioner-defendant being aggrieved upon an order dated 20-11-2008 made in I.A.No.582 of 2008 in O.S.No.399 of 2006 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Adoni.

2. Heard Sri K. Sitaram, learned counsel representing the revision petitioner and Sri R.V. Nagabhushana Rao representing Sri R.V. Prasad, learned counsel representing the respondent, in both the C.R.Ps.

3. Sri K. Sitaram, learned counsel representing the revision petitioner-defendant in both the C.R.Ps, would maintain that the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Adoni totally erred in making the aforesaid orders, since there is no provision in the Code of Civil Procedure (for short ‘the Code’) which enables the court to return a document, which is marked in evidence as an exhibit. He also would maintain that the learned Judge ought to have seen that the trial of the suit had already commenced and Ex.A.1 was