B.CHANDRA KUMAR
D. Vijay Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of A. P. , rep. by P. P. – Respondent
Since both these Revisions in Crl.R.C.No.1307 of 2005 and Crl.R.C. No.1351 of 2005 are directed against the orders both dated 19.07.2005 in Crl.M.P.Nos.116 and 115 of 2005 respectively and arise out of the same S.C.No.690 of 2004 on the file of the V Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Hyderabad, they are being disposed of by this common order.
2. The petitioner in Crl.R.C.No.1307 of 2005 is A-1 and the petitioner in Crl.R.C.No.1351 of 2005 is A-3. The petitioners will be referred as A1 and A3 hereinafter. A1 and A3 filed petitions in Crl.M.P. Nos.116 and 115 of 2005, under Section 227 Cr.P.C praying to discharge them for the offences punishable under Sections 306 and 506 IPC respectively. The learned V Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Hyderabad, by separate orders dated 19.07.2005 in S.C. No.690 of 2004 dismissed those petitions. Aggrieved by the same, they have preferred these revisions.
3. The brief facts of the case are as follows:
The deceased Smt. Sangeetha Sharma, aged about 33 years, was a practising Advocate in A.P. High Court, Hyderabad. She was married to one Pramod Kumar Sharma of Akola (Maharashtra) in the year 1982 a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.